[logo: energyAPI]
Search button  
About Oil and Natural Gas Policy Issues Environment, Health, Safety Industry Statistics Training and Certification Publications Meetings and Events Standards
Sign Up for Email Alerts
 
 

Answers to Frequently Asked Questions About Managing Risks at LNAPL Sites

 
 

This easy-to-read brochure offers answers to practical and technical questions about cost-effective management, cleanup or closure of sites with groundwater impacted by light non-aqueous phase liquids (LNAPL), such as petroleum hydrocarbons.

Adobe PDF Icon
Download
Low Resolution
File Size: 316 KB
Version Date: May 2003
OS: PC/Mac
License: Free

Adobe PDF Icon
Download
High Resolution
File Size: 5.2 MB
Version Date: May 2003
OS: PC/Mac
License: Free

The Questions:

  • What is LNAPL?

  • What happens when LNAPL is released?

  • What makes cleanup of LNAPL releases so challenging?

  • I can measure LNAPL in a well at my site. Shouldn’t I be able to pump it out of the ground?

  • What do I need to know about a site to estimate whether or not LNAPL is moving in the subsurface?

  • Through time, production from my recovery well has decayed down to levels that are small relative to initial rates. How do I decide when to stop?

  • How can I obtain input to models that estimate LNAPL mobility and recoverability?

  • I’ve collected values for the key input parameters. How do I use the data to estimate LNAPL recoverability and mobility?

  • Under the best of circumstances, I think I can remove 25% of the LNAPL. How can I determine what effect this will have on the dissolved plume over short and long time frames?

  • What are some examples of the site conditions where in situ LNAPL treatment is unlikely to improve groundwater quality or otherwise reduce risk? Conversely, what types of sites are likely to benefit from LNAPL treatment?

  • What conditions drive the need for in situ treatment of LNAPL releases?

  • I’ve read studies about innovative technologies that remove >90% of the LNAPL in a contaminated soil.  How are these results important in terms of an overall philosophy towards addressing LNAPL impacted sites?

  • After implementing the best technology, there will still be residual LNAPL in the ground at my site.  How can I determine whether vapor migration will be a problem?

  • The work of API and other researchers seems useful when applied to site-specific problems. How does it affect the overall picture of LNAPL management?

  • There seems to be a lot of different regulations, guidelines, and opinions about “How Clean is Clean” when it comes to LNAPL sites. How do we reconcile the policy and technical conflicts and move forward from here?

 
Newsroom
In the Classroom
About API
     
 
Latest News

API statement on letters supporting resolution against EPA ghg regulation
More

API's Jack Gerard comments on Senate climate meeting
More



Consumer Tips



Related Meeting

Spring Committee on Petroleum Measurement Standards Meeting - Mar. 15-18, 2010 - Dallas, Texas

76th API Federal Tax Forum - April 19-20, 2010 - Houston, Texas



 
   
Updated:April 4, 2007